I guess there are two parts to that question, Mr. Chairman.
In terms of intent to mislead, did we see any evidence that anyone deliberately intended to mislead Parliament with respect to the request for the $50 million of funding? No. But as I indicated earlier, I think questions of expediency should not trump transparency in being correct in what you're going to use the money for when you request it from Parliament.
With respect to the second part of the question—were public servants ever attempting to mislead our auditors in the course of this work—I have no evidence and no reason to believe that was the case. I believe that public servants and everybody we dealt with cooperated openly with us and there were no attempts to mislead us.