I'm not sure exactly which documents you're referring to, but I think it was a difference of opinion over what constituted relevant documents. The commission was saying that everything, whether it touched directly or indirectly on residential schools, would be considered relevant. So they wanted every document, and I think what the government did was that they said, “We're going to define relevance”, and it was more specific. It was things relating to individual residential schools, or policy, or that type of thing. So I think that's probably where there were some documents that the government was saying they weren't going to provide, because they were deeming those not to be relevant.
On May 2nd, 2013. See this statement in context.