I think what we've indicated here is that the cost of secure channel was very high. There was a recognition as well that it wasn't necessarily going to be the best solution to what they were trying to accomplish so there was this change of course in terms of how the secure access would be offered, and that's explained in here. There was a lot of money spent on this initiative. The more recent ways of dealing with this problem are going to be less expensive, so that's a good thing. Nevertheless, there's a lot of sunk cost related to the secure channel.
On February 24th, 2014. See this statement in context.