I appreciate the clarification. It's kind of at a macro policy level. But ultimately if the government is actually using that as a policy tool to encourage people to go somewhere, they really can't tell you where to go except to go to Alberta. I'm not asking you to comment on that. That's a conjecture that I'm making, but it's what I think I just heard, that I wouldn't necessarily use this stuff personally to go look for a job. But if the policy folks are writing and saying, “By the way, there are jobs available in Alberta”, that's about all they could tell me.
Let me go to paragraphs 8.53 and 8.52, because I was interested in them, especially where they talk about the national household survey data and about 25% of the census subdivisions not being any good due to quality concerns. The additional piece is that the data for an additional 686 census subdivisions, or 15%, was not released for confidentiality reasons. Is that a cumulative total, 25% plus 15%? Or is there a subset somewhere inside that 15%?