In the course of your question, you've let me touch on all three of our recommendations. Our other recommendation was about providing more information. We've talked about the fact that there is information available on the website, but at the same time that the main estimates come out, the tax expenditure and evaluation report is prepared. The main estimates are tabled with Parliament, but the tax expenditure and evaluation report is not tabled with Parliament, so making sure that Parliament is aware of all of this information at once would be important to make sure that it isn't forgotten. Again, because these types of expenditures, these tax measures, are substitutes for direct program spending, it's important that there be a way for Parliament to be aware of what they are, that they exist, that the information be tabled, and that it contain the same type of information going forward, future year projections. That is how Parliament can make sure it can still ask questions about the programs and that they still have relevance.
Then from the department point of view, treating the tax measures the same way direct program spending is treated, and doing the same types of evaluations on them that would happen on direct program spending would ensure consistency in the way those types of programs are being evaluated.