In terms of the budget, we understand that having a central pool for the department to draw on in emergency situations probably makes sense as a way to manage contingency funding and emergency funding. What concerned us was the fact that we did see examples in which the department had to draw from its own capital funding to deal with some of the emergency situations. That capital funding would be there to make capital improvements and that sort of thing. Having to draw from that to deal with emergencies was the part that concerned us.
We also identified that of the $448 million that was spent over that four-year time period, only 1% of it, about $4 million, was spent on the prevention or mitigation activities. The department very much is in a mode of having to respond and react to emergencies. We feel that they need to be able to put a bit more focus on prevention and mitigation activities.