Evidence of meeting #1 for Public Accounts in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Caroline Massicotte
Édison Roy-César  Committee Researcher

Alexandra Mendes Liberal Brossard—Saint-Lambert, QC

No, no. We will have 14 minutes.

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

May I, Chair?

9:15 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

Go ahead.

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

It's 14 minutes.

Alexandra Mendes Liberal Brossard—Saint-Lambert, QC

It's 14 minutes. If we accept your proposal, we will have more than...

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Yes, you're right. The government would get 14 minutes, I agree. I can fight only one fight at a time, and over here in the third party, it's all I can do to fight for my own little turf.

Alexandra Mendes Liberal Brossard—Saint-Lambert, QC

May I finish?

According to the proposal we initially put forward, we would have 12 minutes. According to your proposal, we would have 14 minutes. I just want us to understand each other.

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

I understand. It's all the more reason that the official opposition shouldn't—

Alexandra Mendes Liberal Brossard—Saint-Lambert, QC

This will be the order: Liberal Party, Conservative Party, NDP, Liberal Party.

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Yes, I get it. I'm just talking to the seven minutes.

9:15 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

Is that in the second round?

Alexandra Mendes Liberal Brossard—Saint-Lambert, QC

No, I'm talking about the first round.

9:15 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

Can you say that again?

Alexandra Mendes Liberal Brossard—Saint-Lambert, QC

It would be Liberal, Conservative, NDP, Liberal. That's the PROC model.

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Yes, and again, I'm fighting for the extra minute in the opening round based on the fact that I'm rarely going to get my last three minutes.

Alexandra Mendes Liberal Brossard—Saint-Lambert, QC

I understand, Mr. Christopherson. I understand where you're coming from. I'm just saying, putting it on the table, this is what it looks like.

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

No, I agree. I can't do all the heavy lifting from the third party. Again, I say to the official opposition—

Alexandra Mendes Liberal Brossard—Saint-Lambert, QC

We were there before. We were there before. We know that.

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

I say again to the official opposition, give your head a shake here. You're about to allow, if we go with the amendment, as my colleague has mentioned, 14 minutes to control the floor. I don't know why you want to allow that.

But anyway, what I need to know, Chair—

Alexandra Mendes Liberal Brossard—Saint-Lambert, QC

But you say that's what you proposed.

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

I understand that and I'm ready to live with it.

Voices

Oh, oh!

9:15 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

Mr. Christopherson's argument is based on the fact that he may not get a second round. I think that's the reason for his argument.

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

That's a bigger problem for them than me because all I'm going to get is the opening—

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

On the other hand, what the official opposition may want to consider is not just the minutes but whether it will lead to something else.

Is there any other debate on the time, because that is your motion?