Thank you, Chair.
Certainly the community well-being index, although it was not a tool with finesse—I remember using that tool, and it gave some very crude results—you recognized that there were some real issues from those crude results. I think the fact that the instrument is going to be replaced through co-development of another instrument is a positive thing—it's a good thing— although the CWB did have some value at the time to point out some huge discrepancies.
I'm much more concerned regarding your findings in the education area.
The next place I want to dive into is the $42 million. This is a preparatory program for entry into post-secondary education. What was the name of that program? Was it equally dispersed across the country? I mean, an 8% rate of people then actually entering....
Could you give me some details, please?