I think that's interesting. I think there are probably a few things. Some of them might be legislative. There are some requirements in legislation that we have to do. Whenever there are legislative requirements, that indicates to us that Parliament's interested at that point in time, but it also can tie our hands.
For example, in the case of the commissioner of the environment and sustainable development, there's a requirement that we look at the sustainable development strategies of the government once every year, and we do an audit of it.
If we had more flexibility about exactly what types of audits we were going to do, when we were going to do them, that would mean that we wouldn't have our hands tied per se.
Similarly, as I said, we are required to do a special examination of crown corporations at least once every 10 years. Of course, if we think there's a particular crown corporation that we feel it's risky how they're running their operations, we can go in more often than once every 10 years, but there may be crown corporations that are well run. We can look at indicators that say they are well run, and maybe they don't need us in there once every 10 years. Maybe they do, and maybe they don't. Some things that would provide us with a bit more flexibility would be a starting point.