We didn't audit that specific part, obviously.
What I would say, though, is that we made a specific recommendation regarding designation and conservation. We're not suggesting that the government should be investing more funds to conserve the existing buildings; what we're saying is that there is a disconnect between designation and conservation. When you designate and you don't provide the funding to conserve, then you're just looking for trouble.
We have recommended that Parks Canada get together with all of the other departments that have heritage buildings and look at the designation process, and also consider conservation requirements as part of that. That could include anything, including what you're suggesting.