I'm not, at this point in my comments, going to accept all of the assertions made. I would say that I think it is too soon for us to have learned all the lessons, because we still don't know a great deal of what we're dealing with.
The test is always based on what you are finding. First, are you taking it absolutely seriously? Secondly, are you applying a reasonable standard of care given all of the circumstances, including the need to continue to serve Canadians in the field? Are the actions you take meeting the reasonableness test in the legal understanding of the duty of care? That is what we are striving to do.