Like National Defence, we were not in the audit in 2003—or in 2007, in our case.
There really are three things. We're identified in this audit in one, which is the tracking, and I spoke to what we're doing with respect to tracking. We have basically addressed that issue.
Then there are the condition reports, and we've said we'll have those done by 2021.
Then there's actually maintaining the buildings, which I think is going to be the challenge going forward. That really is, I think, a budget issue. As well, as the deputy of National Defence said, we along with the feds will prioritize our spending on assets that are actually being used and that are required for our core mandate.
When we are dealing with heritage buildings, we know about the requirements for heritage buildings and will be guided by the guidance that Parks Canada provides in that regard.
The funding really is an issue. I mentioned this before, but I'll give you some numbers. In our case, in budget 2017 our O & M budget for our real property for 6,600 sites or assets went from $48 million to $110 million. It was a significant increase, and we are able to do some of the things that this audit is asking to do, as well as better maintain all the buildings. On capital, we went from $44 million a year to $88 million a year. That's ongoing, and it has made a genuine difference in terms of being able to address these issues and other issues around heritage buildings.