I think we have over time seen the department take the steps at various times and at different rates of speed. What we are pointing out now is that we feel that the department is engaged in this. We have seen improvements, particularly in their count of the inventory, in knowing the quantity of inventory.
We are still concerned, thought, that they are making what I would call, in some cases, fundamental pricing errors. To get a number for the financial statements, you have to know how much of something you have and how much it cost, in order to put a value on it. We were still finding some fundamental errors of using the wrong numbers and just putting a price on things. There were also some problems with identifying what pieces of inventory are obsolete and what ones are still useable.
I think we've seen significant progress on the quantity side. There are still some improvements that they need to make on the pricing and obsolescence side. Fundamentally, we would have liked to see much better progress over the last 12 years, but given that we are where we are, as Ms. Hogan mentioned, we are now satisfied with the importance the department has put on this. We're satisfied with the progress they've made on the quantity side, but they still need to do more work on the pricing and the obsolescence assessments.