It wasn't really something that we included in the audit in terms of a comparison to others. I think probably, if you bring Status of Women witnesses in for a hearing, they could probably give you a better sense of some of that.
We do lay out, though, in paragraph 1.25 in the report, the components of the framework: a statement of intent or policy; a responsibility centre to monitor the implementation; training for senior officials, analysts, and other appropriate staff; guides, manuals, and other appropriate tools; annual self-assessment on implementation of a GBA framework.
When you look at the basics of the framework, it seems they have a good basis of the framework. What it comes down to is that not every department has been implementing it, and even the departments that have been implementing it aren't always completing it.
The other thing we identified in the audit is that, when it is done, it identifies that there can be a different impact on men or women from a given policy decision, and that has caused there to be adjustments to the way policies have been implemented. I think that shows that that type of analysis does have an impact, and it can cause adjustments to the way policies are put in place.
I think the framework is probably pretty good, and I think there are indications that it can produce results. Not everybody is doing it, and they're not doing it all the time.