When you look at the components of this, it starts with the appointments having to be superior court judges. You're starting with a very small pool of possible appointments, and you have a number of these different tribunals that need to draw from that pool. That's why there's the conversation between the Department of Justice and the judiciary to sort that out.
Really, to get to the bottom of this...and we very much did identify that, with the specific claims tribunal, there was a shortage of members for the tribunal to make its decision. Unfortunately, it seems that everything is focused on the end of the process. What I mean by that is, and maybe I have this wrong, but it's certainly the way I perceive it, when there's a vacancy, there's this process to try to identify who we might be able to pull out of the sitting judges to sit on a tribunal. I think it sounds much more like a classic case of succession planning, so that when judges are appointed in the first place having a bit of an idea of when there might be vacancies on tribunals and which judges might be in the pool they can draw from. I think it's the area where there really has to be a lot more forward thinking in terms of how it's not just about who's getting appointed to the court, that it's also who's going to be able to fill these tribunal positions. Otherwise we can't make decisions on things like first nations specific claims.