Actually, we probably put that in as a target a couple of years ago. It would have been based on looking at historical trends and how many reports we produce. First of all, we would probably have asked ourselves how many of our reports the public accounts committee would have the capacity to look at, also taking into account that our reports are of value in some instances to other committees. Then there are the reports of the commissioner of the environment and sustainable development, which go before the environment committee.
We would have put all of that together based on historical trends as well as the number of meetings we thought the public accounts committee would hold. At that point, we would have determined that about 65% of the audits we produce, given the number of audits we were producing, would be of sufficient interest to parliamentarians that these audits would end up being the subject of a committee hearing.