Thank you.
Given time constraints, I want to move on until the chair hooks me out.
On page 9, exhibit 7.2, under “Assumption”, says:
Support costs for new equipment will be the same or less than for the previous equipment.
The reality is that:
Support costs were as much as two to three times more than those of previous equipment due to enhanced operational capability and additional contractor responsibilities.
Your assumption—and with a lot of these things the assumption is the key—is that everything will be fine, the same cost or less. It ended up costing us two or three times as much.
Again, how did that happen?