Thank you, Mr. Chair. I won't take the full five minutes.
If I may go back to some of the line of questioning that we talked about earlier with regard to the temporary foreign worker program, I'm looking at your “about the audit” page in report 5, at page 21, which talks about scope and approach.
On the first aspect of the scope and the approach, you say that you “interviewed officials at Department headquarters and at regional service centres in Vancouver, British Columbia; Toronto, Ontario; and Saint John, New Brunswick”. The second aspect is that you “conducted work in regional [service] centres in Vancouver, Toronto, and Saint John” again.
I guess I'm looking for something here. We've had a real concern about the temporary foreign worker program, particularly in Alberta, and its lack of that regional approach over the years. I'd be curious if you can point me to something, somewhere, where you looked outside those three centres. Again, the types of temporary foreign worker concerns that would impact an area such as Saint John, New Brunswick, versus a location like an Edmonton, a Calgary, or a Fort McMurray in Alberta would I think be vastly different.
Perhaps these officials could comment on the Alberta-specific unemployment rate or the temporary foreign worker program. Again, I'm looking for your assistance to point to something there to show that we considered Alberta.