I don't know. I'm not so convinced about that. It's an audit report, and any superintendent not filling out information for an audit report should make alarm bells go off.
Now, 71% of those who responded said they spent less than 25% of their shifts overseeing border service officers. Not only that, 60% said they did not have enough time to supervise on-site operations. From reading the report, it seems pretty clear that much of the checks and balances on a lot of these things, the secondary eyeballs, and independent second view are by the superintendents. This seems to be a very worrying state of affairs. Can you comment on it, please?