When you asked what could have been done, my first reaction is that we audit at a point in time and look at the status of systems and processes to determine whether they're in place. We don't necessarily go through a hindsight exercise of what could have been or would have been to produce a different result.
I think we're finding that the governance and appointments issue is a pretty important and systemic question that needs to be properly addressed and resolved, in order to ensure that there are competent, sufficient board members in place and a process to ensure continuity.
I would draw to the committee's attention that this isn't the first special examination in which we've reported on problems with appointments and problems with governance challenges. As Mr. Bevan rightly indicated, this report does allude to some of the challenges in the act and the actual governance structure that one of your colleagues had noted. That would be the first lesson that we're beginning to amalgamate in totality that is important to learn. You need to get that right to set the tone that can allow the rest of the operations to be effective.