Indeed.
Well, I think if our evidence on issues about whether departments are doing analyses is about whether there was email correspondence back and forth that talked about there being some analysis done, that's not the depth of evidence, let's say, that we need to be able to conclude whether analysis was at an appropriate level.
So, yes, and we said in the report that they indicated to us that they had done the analysis, which we wouldn't normally put in a report if that had just been a verbal “we did something”. We put that in the report because, yes, there was some evidence that there was information that existed, but at the end of the day, the point is still the point. We needed to see the actual analysis to be able to conclude on this.