You're absolutely right in terms of differentiating between the tool and the actual goal it's trying to achieve. In terms of gender-based analysis as a tool, we have one of the best in the world. We've modelled it after the Europeans. That's where the “plus” came from. It's not just GBA; it's actually going deeper than the impact on women and men, and is looking at the ages of women, the income levels of women, the ethnicity, the language. Our tool has been modelled after some European tools, and we're now basically looked to as a model by other countries.
As I was saying to you, when we were at the United Nations committee on the status of women, we heard a lot about Canada, about the tools and the structures we have in place over here to advance us. The GBA tool, with the online course that my colleagues were referring to, has been looked to as a model in terms of how we're carrying this out in Canada.
We're all learning from each other. Basically we try to have this continuous improvement cycle so that as we get more feedback, or as we learn from other countries what they're doing with regard to the tool they started with from us, we then adopt their best practices as well.