Certainly, nothing that we have recommended is in any way intended to compromise protection. I think we have to consider this. If a person ends up spending more time in the institution, and let's say they don't get the programming they need as soon as they need it, then what are they doing in the institution while they're waiting around for that programming? That's why it's important to get them quickly the programming they need, to get them through that programming, and then to assess them to determine whether they are ready to move out into the community. Once it's been determined that they are ready to move out—and it could be day parole or those other things—then we can start that reintegration.
To me, the worst-case scenario is if people in maximum security are not successful at getting out on parole and then get out at the time when they have to get out. Then the amount of time they have to reintegrate is very short. That's when you end up with the situations that are perhaps the most dangerous in terms of protection to the community. It's not just about keeping them within the institution; it's about making sure that these people are not going to be dangerous to the community once they get out of the institution. Making sure they have enough time and enough supervision at that end is influenced by what happens to them in the institution.