Hear, hear!
Evidence of meeting #1 for Public Accounts in the 43rd Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was clerk.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Evidence of meeting #1 for Public Accounts in the 43rd Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was clerk.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Bloc
Maxime Blanchette-Joncas Bloc Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques, QC
Can we reveal the results of a secret vote?
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Dean Allison
Now we're going to move forward with the adoption of routine motions. I will go through the list. We'll have a bit of business to discuss after routine motions are done. I don't want to say that this will be a short meeting and then it ends up not being one, but it will be a shorter meeting than we're used to.
The Clerk
The members of the committee received by email on February 6 the list of the routine motions adopted by this committee during the previous Parliament. Of course we're not bound by them, especially since the membership has changed a little, so numbers might change, but these are an indication of what type of motion this committee usually has.
The chair will be receiving motions.
NDP
Matthew Green NDP Hamilton Centre, ON
I have two motions and wanted to make sure that I presented them at the appropriate time. One is on quorum and one is on in camera proceedings. Would it please you, through this committee, that I bring them up at the appropriate time during the course of the routine motions, or would you like me to hold them until after?
Conservative
NDP
Matthew Green NDP Hamilton Centre, ON
Then you want the quorum motion during the routine proceedings, and then the in camera motion after.
February 25th, 2020 / 11:20 a.m.
Liberal
Lloyd Longfield Liberal Guelph, ON
I have routine motions that we have been using, with a section on independent members' clause-by-clause.
I'm wondering whether we could use ours.
Liberal
Lloyd Longfield Liberal Guelph, ON
This is what we're using in other committees. It was negotiated with all parties in this Parliament.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Dean Allison
Okay. Can we distribute them, then, and we'll have a look at them.
Maxime.
Bloc
Maxime Blanchette-Joncas Bloc Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques, QC
I just want to point out to the other members that the Bloc Québécois wasn't on the committee in the previous Parliament. As a result, we most likely need to review some motions regarding in camera meetings and the questioning of witnesses.
We know that some arrangements, some routine motions, have already been established. However, I wanted to raise this issue and inform my fellow members.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Dean Allison
We're going to go through each motion one by one.
Mr. Longfield, please read them. I will give people a chance to make sure they're onside. Where it's appropriate, Mr. Green can jump in.
Liberal
Lloyd Longfield Liberal Guelph, ON
Thanks, Mr. Chair.
First of all, on analysts:
That the Committee retain, as needed at the discretion of the Chair, the services of one or more analysts from the Library of Parliament to assist in its work.
(Motion agreed to)
Conservative
Liberal
Greg Fergus Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC
Mr. Chair, before we begin, could the clerk introduce us to his fellow analysts so that we can all learn their names? We'll be working with them for the next few months, if not years.
The Clerk
Yes, gladly.
First, I should mention that I won't be with you for very long since I'm replacing your clerk, Angela Crandall. She's on sick leave at the moment, but she should be back on Tuesday, March 10. Her name is on the committee's website.
Since I used to be a clerk for the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, I know Mr. Theckedath and Mr. Léonard very well. I worked with them for almost two years. André Léonard and Dillan Theckedath have been analysts at the Library of Parliament for several years. If I remember correctly, they've been working with the committee for six years.
Is that right?