I will. I'm going to interject there. You might not want to, but I will. I'll set aside the compensation, because that would include, perhaps, getting into an area where you don't want to go.
I can't understand how, when the clerk is making the assertion that many organizations are creating anti-racism task forces, advancing dialogue to better understand and address what is transpiring in the workplace, you have an entire subset of your service calling for a Black equity commission. You can appoint somebody as a central coordinating entity to carry out and investigate these challenges.
I can share with you that having this as a piecemeal department-by-department response would be wholly inadequate. There has been a call for equitable representation, as per the employment law. There has been a call for the ability for self-declaration. There has been a call for external reporting mechanisms, your own reports on what we're dealing with today, talking about culture, talking about the fear for people to go along with the higher-ups.
I'm wondering why the clerk and the public service would try to parallel a discussion that has already been framed by some of the most egregious claims against the public service, rather than just work with these public sector workers to help negotiate equitable resolutions for this.