All right.
I will quote the Auditor General’s report.
We found similar issues in the two professional services contracts awarded by the Public Health Agency of Canada to KPMG. While the first contract included milestones with clear deliverables and pricing, these were later amended and replaced with less‑specific deliverables to allow for more flexibility.
Extensions were not linked to new tasks, and merely pushed back deadlines, thus increasing the price of contracts.
This completely contradicts what you told me earlier, Ms. Lee. The invoices sent to the Public Health Agency of Canada were less and less specific, and the changes to the contract were not linked to specific tasks and merely increased the price of the contract, without adding new tasks for the same amount. That completely contradicts what you told me.
Why did KPMG agree to take more money and change the invoices to be less and less specific? Was it a public health order, or did KPMG simply decide to pocket more money?