Thank you very much.
Very good. We're going to go over the subcommittee meeting we had recently. Of note, I'm negotiating with the subcommittee members for a follow-up meeting, based in part on any feedback out of this, to plan the next steps.
I will say off the top that the deadline for ArriveCAN witnesses, as per my email, is tomorrow at noon. Given that it's a caucus day, that probably means tonight for most members because we're locked up without our devices—at least some of us are—for caucus meetings. I will just flag that to you and your teams.
Could I ask the subcommittee members to meet me right after the meeting so that we can try to agree on a time for the next meeting?
I'll go through this and see if I have it more or less correct. Then we'll pick it up from there. There are about eight points.
On March 21, your subcommittee met to discuss and prioritize upcoming business and to review the calendar. We will have a meeting on the 11th on “Report 2—Housing in First Nations Communities”. We'll have a meeting on the 16th on “Report 4—National Trade Corridors Fund”.
We will then have Ms. Anand in the first hour on the 18th. This is per a motion that was passed by this committee but was also discussed, approved and reinforced in the subcommittee. We'll have the Auditor General on the main estimates in the second hour. This was again discussed in the subcommittee. It's also something that we as a committee do automatically.
On April 30, we'll meet on the topic of “Report 3—First Nations and Inuit Policing Program”.
These studies reflect the priorities, alongside ArriveCAN, as provided by the parties of the committee. I think everyone agreed that there were a number of top priorities, and I would say that we settled on everyone's top two. Some parties had a longer list. Others were quite focused, so what I did with the calendar was to fill up what was agreed to.
There was a request from Mr. Desjarlais for possible additional studies on the indigenous studies. Before going too far down that path, Mr. Desjarlais agreed to first have these meetings, and then we would come back to the subcommittee to discuss next steps.
The clerk and I are still working to find a date for Minister Blair, as per a motion that was passed by this committee.
We've scheduled, as per the study on Public Accounts 2023, with the Bank of Canada and the CPP Investment Board. This had previously been agreed to as part of a broader study on Public Accounts 2023. We were able to hear from witnesses from the government members, as well as the Bloc Québécois. These last two are for the Conservatives and the NDP.
We will also be hosting an informal meeting with Indonesian lawmakers on their public accounts committee on May 23, after our regular meeting. This obviously is more in the area of our diplomatic relations as lawmakers. They're hoping to come in to see our committee doing its normal business in public. We'll try to find something on the calendar for that. Then we'll have a discussion with them afterwards.
Finally, we finalized wording for the INAN committee letter, which was distributed to all of you. It was then sent to that committee. Again, that's as per a motion that was passed in this committee.
That's really the discussion that we had and the best that I could distill it, with assistance from the clerk.
I'm happy to take comments on it, and we'll see where we're at there.
Mr. Desjarlais was first.