Evidence of meeting #126 for Public Accounts in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was kpmg.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Imraan Bashir  Partner, Cybersecurity, KPMG
John Bernard  Chief Executive Officer, Donna Cona Inc.
Christopher Loschmann  Director, Canadian Government Services, TEKsystems
Barry Dowdall  President, Donna Cona Inc.
Lydia Lee  Partner and National Leader, Digital Health Transformation Practice, KPMG
Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Naaman Sugrue

5:15 p.m.

President, Donna Cona Inc.

Barry Dowdall

If I might, I would just say what I've already said, which is that all of our contracts were competitively procured through the RFP process. There was no sole source or anything. They were all in the RFP process, and we were successful in winning them through a very competitive process. These processes are very competitive.

5:15 p.m.

Liberal

Valerie Bradford Liberal Kitchener South—Hespeler, ON

Okay.

Ms. Lee.

May 30th, 2024 / 5:15 p.m.

Partner and National Leader, Digital Health Transformation Practice, KPMG

Lydia Lee

Thank you for the member's question.

I just want to add, on behalf of KPMG, that we're really proud of the work we did to support both the Public Health Agency of Canada and CBSA during the COVID-19 pandemic. At the time, circumstances for both agencies were incredibly stressful. At all times we followed the government's preferred procurement process, and we did not influence that procurement process. We abided by it at their request. I just want to clarify that.

5:15 p.m.

Liberal

Valerie Bradford Liberal Kitchener South—Hespeler, ON

Okay.

How much time do I have left?

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative John Williamson

You have about 20 seconds.

5:15 p.m.

Liberal

Valerie Bradford Liberal Kitchener South—Hespeler, ON

Do you have anything that you would like to add?

5:15 p.m.

Director, Canadian Government Services, TEKsystems

Christopher Loschmann

I have no additional clarifications at this time.

5:15 p.m.

Liberal

Valerie Bradford Liberal Kitchener South—Hespeler, ON

Okay.

I'll cede my time.

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative John Williamson

Thank you very much.

Beginning our fourth and final round, Mr. Brock, you have the floor for five minutes, please.

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

Larry Brock Conservative Brantford—Brant, ON

Thank you, Chair.

Mr. Bashir, I'm still going to be circling back on your relationship with GC Strategies and Kristian Firth.

Your evidence is somewhat clear: three to four possible meetings with Mr. Firth before you engaged with him pursuant to direction given by Mr. Utano. Did any of those meetings occur at his place of business?

5:15 p.m.

Partner, Cybersecurity, KPMG

Imraan Bashir

No, sir, they did not.

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

Larry Brock Conservative Brantford—Brant, ON

Okay.

Were they all at the government offices?

5:15 p.m.

Partner, Cybersecurity, KPMG

Imraan Bashir

All in the lobby of 90 Elgin, from what I recall...yes.

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

Larry Brock Conservative Brantford—Brant, ON

Were you familiar with where he conducted his business?

5:15 p.m.

Partner, Cybersecurity, KPMG

Imraan Bashir

I did not have any line of sight into that.

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

Larry Brock Conservative Brantford—Brant, ON

He probably didn't tell you that he operated out of his basement, did he?

5:15 p.m.

Partner, Cybersecurity, KPMG

Imraan Bashir

I did not have any line of sight into that either.

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

Larry Brock Conservative Brantford—Brant, ON

No, he didn't offer that.

5:15 p.m.

Partner, Cybersecurity, KPMG

Imraan Bashir

That's correct.

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

Larry Brock Conservative Brantford—Brant, ON

He didn't tell you where he worked out of? Did he give you a business card at least?

5:15 p.m.

Partner, Cybersecurity, KPMG

Imraan Bashir

It's possible. I don't recall, but I don't recall the basement conversation coming up.

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

Larry Brock Conservative Brantford—Brant, ON

Okay.

Help me with this, because I have a hard time reconciling the evidence your partner, Mr. Hartaj Nijjar, gave on the last occasion and your evidence today with respect to a very key issue.

My colleague Mr. Nater used the phrase “flim-flammed”. You weren't familiar with that phrase. It could be “hoodwinked”. It could be “snowed”. It could be “lied to”. You certainly didn't know is what I understand. They offered no IT services whatsoever. They were strictly a middleman connecting the Government of Canada with professionals.

You're saying that you didn't know that and Mr. Firth didn't volunteer that information. That's what you're telling us today. Is that correct?

5:20 p.m.

Partner, Cybersecurity, KPMG

Imraan Bashir

That is correct.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Larry Brock Conservative Brantford—Brant, ON

Here's the problem. Your partner, Mr. Nijjar, on the last occasion at committee, said the firm, KPMG, followed “rigorous...processes” and determined “no adverse considerations in contracting with GC Strategies, given that [they were] a well-known entity in the government sector”. Both versions cannot be true at the same time.

What were those “rigorous...processes” that determined there were “no adverse considerations”? Did you at least do an address check?

5:20 p.m.

Partner, Cybersecurity, KPMG

Imraan Bashir

I don't know the details. I'll ask Ms. Lee after this to provide whatever details she can about our acceptance processes, which are executed by another team. My understanding is that they look into a variety of factors, including the board of directors or C-suite, any kind of—