Forgive me for contradicting you, but that is false. That's what Botler AI did: Botler AI talked about widespread corruption at the Border Services Agency. Botler AI is the one sounding the alarm. Indeed, the company had noticed the behaviours, the ones you witnessed, that sparked the entire ArriveCAN affair.
What you're telling me is that consultants at Botler AI in Montreal may be more aware of or more familiar with the risks and compliances associated with going through a subcontractor like GC Strategies, an empty company or cell that only obtains a commission. What's more, you're telling me that this is completely normal. Finally, you say that Botler AI is aware of this, but that you don't see anything. And yet you've been informed that there was certainly a conflict of interest.
The reason Antonio Utano asked to go through GC Strategies was because it was in the interest of GC Strategies. You haven't seen anything. I find that really unfortunate, because you could have told us today that, in light of the Auditor General's report, you thought it was strange, and that you should have done things differently and sounded the alarm by saying that you thought this process was not normal.