You said at the beginning that the department takes the management of these issues seriously, that you, as the deputy, were only made aware of this when the whistle-blower came to you, and that the board's decisions, done at arm's length, don't remove your department's responsibility over the expenditure of taxpayer dollars.
In 186 instances, perhaps with some overlap, you had an assistant deputy minister in the meeting and conflicts were declared, or were partially. He testified obtusely on those issues. Did he, as a person responsible for oversight on behalf of this department, ever report to you what was happening in the time that you were a deputy? I believe you were appointed in September 2019.