I'm going to move on to another topic.
You mentioned in your opening statement that you were still reviewing projects covered by the Auditor General's recommendation number 6.29. However, SDTC's response to that recommendation was a partial acceptance. That response practically says that Sustainable Development Technology Canada's managers and employees are smart enough to determine whether the projects meet the criteria. Today, however, you stated that you were following the recommendation. That is inconsistent.
Are you changing SDTC's response to the Auditor General, or are you instead going back on what you said today and saying that the acceptance of this key recommendation was only partial?