That's quite relevant. So you had conversations on that subject. I imagine you've seen the answers provided by SDTC and that you targeted that recommendation; it is important, after all. That's really the most important recommendation in the Auditor General's report, and it has only been partly accepted. You're now telling me that the current board members were appointed after the former board's responses were written and that, in the end, you accepted the recommendation.
Have you spoken with those who partly accepted the recommendation so that it can go forward, or are you using big words to tell us that you accept it without it truly going forward?