In the Auditor General's report, there were two ecosystem projects, for example, that were clearly deemed to be ineligible, and the board took action immediately to cease funding for ecosystem projects, because the Auditor General determined that ecosystem projects in general were not eligible under the contribution agreement.
There were also issues regarding approval of the seed funding programs, primarily around the governance and approval process, so those have also been stopped by the board. That program will be transferred, we expect, to the National Research Council.
Then, in the case of the start-up funding, there are obviously different categories, as the member indicated, including a category where the Auditor General has reviewed and not found any issues of ineligibility. There are also categories where the Auditor General did find eligibility issues. They noted that they did not perform a technological assessment of projects and, therefore, did request that all of the projects under this entire period be reviewed one by one.
Of course, there will be different categories. As I noted in terms of funding restarts, we're looking on a priority basis at the projects where we have companies that have met their agreements, and we'll be looking at those as a first step. It's prioritizing the companies where they are in progress on projects and where funding has been paused. As those go forward, we'll be able to work on the restart.