The committee did in fact discuss the problems. That is the purpose of the committee; it raises all the issues. It is hard for me to compare those two files because we saw 250 files. You will appreciate that I have a much broader view of things.
There were in-depth discussions. On the one hand, there might be an expert from a university who says it is the best idea going, while on the other, there might be a different kind of expert or administrator who knows the problems in the sector and leads the board to a specific decision. It is really a combination of elements that determines whether or not we support a project.
The expertise around the table included engineers, accountants, lawyers, and business people. There were all kinds of people offering their opinions from different points of view, which the board vigorously debated.
I cannot speak to the specific project you are talking about. On the other hand, I can tell you that the process was very transparent, that it was discussed and was honest. The SDTC employees also offered opinions on the files, and they were very competent. We listened carefully to what they had to say. Moreover, they presented the details of each file along with their recommendations.