In response to my previous question, you said that you didn't think your role was policing. Now you're telling me that, ultimately, you told the management of Sustainable Development Technology Canada that there were problems and that there was non-compliance with the contribution agreement.
Excuse me, but that's very contradictory. At the meetings of the board of directors, you said nothing when certain projects did not meet the requirements of the contribution agreement, but you intervened on the ecosystem component. It's not consistent.