Just a moment, Mr. Noseworthy.
More than $38 million was granted without projects going through the project review committee in a diligent manner, even though it's required in the contribution agreement. You were at that meeting, and you had that information in hand.
If you understand what is written in the contribution agreement, that public money must be treated with caution and that projects must be reviewed separately, that you participated in the meeting and that you allowed projects to be approved as a group without having been assessed on a case-by-case basis, that's not normal.
We know that many of these projects belonged to and directly benefited members of the board of directors. You were there. Conflict of interest declarations were even made at that time.
So you didn't say anything?