Okay, Mr. Noseworthy, but that's not the case.
Several of the projects that were approved at that time benefited board members. It had nothing to do with existing projects. Did someone mislead you? Did anyone tell you that this was the case when it wasn't? Be clearer. Right now, it looks like you were a tourist in the room. According to the deputy minister, it was part of your job to be in the room and to be his eyes and ears. You were paid for that.
Now you're telling me you're not too sure. Frankly, a little rigour please. Did you say anything? It was clearly a breach of the contribution agreement. You should have at least mentioned it.