In your report, we see that the dependency is accentuated by the fact that the data is in the hands of Accenture. What's more, although we raised the risk arising from the fact that there was only one company, it was the Department of Finance that hesitated a little and didn't shoulder its responsibilities so that there could be a public call for tenders.
In the end, we simply let Accenture define the conditions, set the prices and continue to absorb public funds. At the end of the day, we don't know much about what Accenture did, because, as you said, EDC didn't even bother to check whether what it was paying for was actually related to the services that were offered.
Is that correct?