Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
If we can, I want to return to the deputy minister of environment.
In my previous round of questioning, we heard that in relation to the two models—and I'll be as clear as possible—one of those models projects existing policies and investments, and the other one projects what the Office of the Auditor General and the commissioner are calling “assumptions”. We just heard from the director general of your department that it's the policy intention to adopt some of these policies over time and to build them into the plan.
They sound more like goals than a solid plan where we could project with credibility a guaranteed reduction in emissions. If we're lending this much credibility to what is defined in the commissioner's report as assumptions, have you actually spoken to the minister directly about adopting these principles that are within your reporting to hit the targets that he has committed to?