Thank you for the question. I'll say three things.
The first thing is that we definitely agree that the housing challenge and overcrowding had an impact throughout COVID-19. Overcrowding does present huge challenges for health. That would be my first point.
My second point would be around temporary isolation and alternative accommodations. We did provide infrastructure for temporary isolation requirements for communities, and that was also because of conversations we had with leadership who did not necessarily want to use the school gym or the school library, just because of what it meant for the children in their communities, so there were some isolation units sent across the country. There were different types for different purposes, and that was one strategy. The second was alternate accommodation outside the community. In cases of very vulnerable populations, they were flown out to a hub, perhaps in Winnipeg, where they would be in isolation hotels where we would provide some support.
My final comment would be that throughout the omicron crisis, because of the spread, when it hit a household, we had to make determinations, because sometimes people would isolate at home, which meant that the support shifted from isolation outside the home to supports within the home, and that meant food deliveries, wellness checks and ensuring well-being in the isolation of individuals at that time.
But I will say wholeheartedly that overcrowding was a challenge.