That's actually a large question to answer.
I think there are two broad levels of things that we do. One is the infrastructure security piece, and that's where the investment in Shared Services paid dividends. When it was created, that wasn't the plan. The plan was to figure out how to consolidate infrastructure and save costs. What it did was give us a platform to build very strong cybersecurity and kind of ring the government with defences. Those are continuously augmented. We invest, constantly upgrade and keep up with modern technology. SSC provides the best available infrastructure-level modern technology, and then we have our partners at the Communications Security Establishment on top of that.
Then we turn to our partners in the departments, where we look at things like fraud, abuse of the systems, social engineering, etc., and try to provide them with the skills they need or the services they need, but to augment that part, which is a very hard problem as well, and a different set of cybersecurity problems. The investment is continuous and changes constantly. We are constantly upgrading. It requires that continuous investment just because the threat environment is incredibly fast paced.