I understand, but you're before a parliamentary committee. You're not before the media now. When we ask a question, you're actually supposed to answer the question.
Did you look seriously at the question of whether—even if an assessment found a very low risk in a profile of a refund of $4.9 million, for example—there should be a level of a lesser amount that an agent, a human being, would look at before a refund was processed if it was over that amount, regardless of the threshold of risk?