Thank you.
To respond to Mr. Lemire, and with great respect to your motion, we have seen a lot of investment—a lot of money, a lot of time, a lot of witnesses and a lot of meetings. The numbers that I put forward were on ArriveCAN alone, the 24 meetings and 90 witnesses at this committee and similarly with OGGO. Are we chasing good money after bad?
I'm not arguing your motion. If IT needs to be looked at, my concern with highlighting these two things as part of an inquiry on IT or looking at IT is that whoever is conducting the inquiry will take it that these are the priorities. There's been a lot of water under the bridge on the many mistakes that were fixed. If IT is still an issue, IT is the issue and I think we need to focus on IT.
I think it's distracting to have these two things highlighted as part of the motion.