I think it's more assertive than clear, but we can live with that.
I also think the French version should instead say “si une information est exclue”, because it's on a case-by-case basis when it comes to businesses. I'd put it more in singular. Every time a business is excluded, we want to know why, and the justification is one of the three factors mentioned.
I'm not an expert, so if the legislative clerks are comfortable that the information we want can be provided, then I can support that.
