I don't know the article you're referring to. This is where I would expect that rigour be applied where rigour is meant to be applied. We saw that the immigration department has risk units that do a really good job of analyzing risk by country and region. However, we saw inconsistencies with those risk assessments or the follow-through on information.
The department should care about the rigour of the immigration process, not just at the intake of an application but while individuals are in Canada, and when they should comply with the permits and leave. We found that the department really needs to do a better job at managing those risks throughout the rest of the process, not just in the application stream.