Okay.
Can we talk about the increase in funding that has not necessarily borne the positive results one would hope for that amount of money?
With respect to infrastructure in the drinking water advisories in particular, how important is funding versus, or together with, the dialogue we have with the first nations communities themselves about monitoring? I understand they are responsible for actually deciding whether or not the advisory should be lifted in conjunction with Health Canada standards.
We have the funding on one side, and we have the actual standards on the other.