I'm not sure about that actual KPI, but my friend here might be able to address it.
I think part of it is that mental wellness and mental health is an area in which the department spends probably over $1 billion per year between our mental wellness programming and our non-insured health benefits. It's important that, even if we don't have a good indicator and good data, which is frequently the case.... You, having been a chief, know that a lot of this data is subject to OCAP: to who owns it, to whether we can access it and to whether it is disaggregated so that it actually has an indigenous component.
Sometimes I think—and I'm speaking of something I don't really know; I'm speculating here—for lack of a better indicator, we take the data that we have. It's definitely not an afterthought or a cut-and-paste. It's probably the best we have, but it is our duty to actually look at that, to say what we need and to work with partners to make sure we have a system of inputs that make sense going forward.
I'm not sure, Candice, if you want to speak to that at all.