This is an important amendment. One of the things we've been talking about all evening and as long as we've been talking about this whole motion is the sheer number of documents. I've been told, certainly, that we're looking at millions of documents, and it could be an immense cost to translate them, redact them and so on, so this really narrows it down. It takes it from a 10-year period to a two-year period. It cuts it down to probably 20% of the documents, to start with.
This is a really important thing. If we can get through all those documents, we should be able to come up with some good questions to ask the various officials when we do the study.
The whole point of this is not the documents. The point of this is to do the study, at the end of the day, so we can drill down into what happened and when, and figure out what went wrong, how we can fix it and, frankly, how we can avoid it going forward.
I want to emphasize that cutting this back to two years would be really helpful to deliver meaningful outputs and meaningful results from this motion.