I agree with that. That is what I was going to say.
Mr. Lemire, if the committee decides to pursue the study of the present motion, it doesn't mean that your motion is void.
Evidence of meeting #38 for Public Accounts in the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was dayforce.
A video is available from Parliament.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative John Williamson
I agree with that. That is what I was going to say.
Mr. Lemire, if the committee decides to pursue the study of the present motion, it doesn't mean that your motion is void.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative John Williamson
I'll just need a second.
Mr. McKinnon, you had your hand up earlier. Do you wish to speak to this?
Liberal
Ron McKinnon Liberal Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam, BC
I was fundamentally going to agree with you as well.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative John Williamson
You have to stop saying that in public.
Go ahead, Mr. McKinnon.
Liberal
Ron McKinnon Liberal Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam, BC
This motion is what's before us right now. We need to debate or vote on it. If there's any other motion we want to deal with, we can do it at that time.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative John Williamson
As you know, I can't call a vote. The debate has to collapse.
Mr. Lemire, the floor is yours.
Bloc
Sébastien Lemire Bloc Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I need clarification on two items, unless the information was sent by email, and I didn't see it.
I just want to make sure the departments are named. Is Shared Services Canada a department?
Is this department among the departments mentioned in the motion?
Conservative
Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent—Akiawenhrahk, QC
I'm told that the paper version says “la Comité” instead of “le Comité”.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative John Williamson
All right.
Any other questions?
Mr. Lemire, the floor is yours.
Bloc
Sébastien Lemire Bloc Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC
I'd like to raise a second issue. You'll note that there is unanimous consent to add the testimony of a witness who was mentioned in the original motion. It's John Ostrander, the former technical lead for the benefits delivery modernization program.
I'll explain why I think this is important. He was one of the main leaders of the modernization program. From 2017 to 2020, when the government chose the Cúram software, he was vice-president and general manager at IBM. He was vice-president at IBM when problems arose in Ontario in 2015. In the Auditor General's report, he is mentioned, in particular, in paragraph 1.66.
I think he's one of the people we'd like to ask many questions of.
Conservative
Bloc
Sébastien Lemire Bloc Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC
It is, indeed, an amendment.
I move that the motion be amended by adding, after the words “associate deputy minister”, the words “John Ostrander, former technical lead, benefits delivery modernization”.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative John Williamson
You mentioned Mr. Ostrander, but who's the other person mentioned?
Bloc
Sébastien Lemire Bloc Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC
Mr. Groen is already mentioned in the motion. My amendment would add Mr. Ostrander to the motion.
Conservative
Liberal
Tom Osborne Liberal Cape Spear, NL
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I think our side is okay with adding this as an amendment.
The only caution I'd put to the group is that we can compel the first witness, but I believe Mr. Ostrander is retired. We can invite him, but I'm not sure we can compel him.
We're okay with adding that as an amendment.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative John Williamson
Okay.
Ms. Tesser Derksen, would you like to speak to that? I didn't mean to bypass you. I just saw Mr. Osborne's hand up first.
Is that agreed to in principle?
(Amendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])
(Motion as amended agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])
I'm going to suspend....
Mr. Lemire, the floor is yours.
Bloc
Sébastien Lemire Bloc Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC
Mr. Chair, I would invite the committee to proceed to a vote on the preceding motion, which we debated until 8 p.m. on Monday, so that we can deal with it.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative John Williamson
In order to come back to this motion, which is a dilatory motion, we require a vote.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative John Williamson
You asked to come back to this motion, which is a dilatory motion.
There's no debate, so I'm going to have the clerk turn to the vote, please.
You're voting yes to go back to Monsieur Lemire's motion right now, and no is to not.
(Motion negatived: nays 5; yeas 4)