Mr. Chair, I know we've set a number of items forward, and we were talking about the one meeting. But perhaps to finish the process what we need to do is try in some sense to define the scope of our undertaking with respect to Maher Arar.
What I'm hearing you say—and I don't have a problem with it—is that you would like to move in two parts. One would be looking at the leaks, with a view to the past and answering some of the questions of how they occurred. I don't have a problem with that. The second part would be dealing with going forward, as the second part of Justice O'Connor's report comes out. I don't have a problem with that.
Dealing specifically with the scope of how leaks occurred and how we're going to find this out, I make two suggestions. One, I think most of the suggested deputants make sense, and we would concur. I would also add the head of the Canadian Security Intelligence Review Committee.